Views: 878

Written by:

Exposing Complaintslist.com

Complaintslist.com is a cheap wordpress-based consumer complaint site. It couldn’t has costed more than $2000-2500 to develop it. Here, we reveal and expose the actual people behind it, their scam network, modus operandi, associates and more.

They’re no consumer’s voice. In fact, we can prove that over 60% of their complaints and comments are manufactured by them. They have dedicated writers who keep on adding new targeted complaints and comments to boost their search engine ranks. They then give their victims no choice but to pay them $500-$5000 for removal as extortion fee.

Note!
This report has been submitted by an anonymous user and we are publishing it as is. For those with legal acumen, kindly Google CDA section 230. De ja vu anyone ? Alternatively, sue us !

How is this still a thing ?

If you visit http://www.complaintslist.com/dispute-a-complaint/ , you’ll see that they blatantly charge $500 just to allow a hapless victim of their defamation scam to dispute an obvious fake complaint. For eg – if I go and write ‘Elvis is still alive and owes me $500’, they won’t remove it until Elvis pays them $500. The dispute process is a sham since its an open secret that the complaint is fake, the complainant usually does not exist since they themselves add the complaints and comments. The victim knows that a legal process might cost a lot more and take months. Meanwhile, the complaint will continue to harass and embarrass the victim, his personal and professional reputation being held hostage.

Oh, did I mention that the owner of complaintslist.com also used to own reputationdoctors.com ?

So who runs complaintslist.com ?

The principal owner is –

Jay Daignault
1550 Larimer Street #215
Denver, CO 80202

This is his website – www.jaydaignault.com . The company name under which this is operated  –  Duxbury Ventures, LLC

He also runs an SEO and Brand Marketing business at www.internetcreators.com. How convenient.

Here are his business’s names-

Hiw web designer partner is – DIEGO MANTILLA . We’re about to contact his clients soon 🙂

Now now, please don’t go about writing dozens of complaints against his businesses on other complaint sites. That’s not right. Right ?

Ashley is on the right

Mrs Daignault, her name Ashley Ballard – https://www.facebook.com/ashley.ballard.9847 .

Yes, she is aware of what her husband does to others.

But c’mon now people, family is out of bounds.

Let’s keep it civil.

 

 

Here is a complete list of websites he runs –

  • AtlantaHotelSavings.com
  • BostonHotelSavings.com
  • BroadwayShowsNewYork.com
  • ChicagoHotelSavings.com
  • DallasHotelSavings.com
  • DealsLasVegas.com
  • DealsNewYork.com
  • DebtFreeLLC.com
  • DenverHotelSavings.com
  • Discount Cheap Tickets
  • DuxburyVenturesLLC.com
  • GolfMentalMastery.com
  • HawaiiHotelSavings.com
  • HoustonHotelSavings.com
  • JayDaignault.com
  • OrlandoHotelSavings.com
  • LasVegasVacationSite.com
  • LosAngelesHotelSavings.com
  • MiamiHotelSavings.com
  • MyrtleBeachHotelSavings.com
  • NewYork.com
  • NewYorkHotelSavings.com
  • ReputationDoctors.com
  • SanFranciscoHotelSavings.com
  • SeattleHotelSavings.com
  • Turbo-Net.com

Here is Jay Daignault promoting complainstlist.com at his Google+ page-  https://plus.google.com/+JayDaignaultGoogle

 

 

Here’s another example of how Jay and his team of extortionists plant content on the fake complaints. Just go to http://www.complaintslist.com/debt-collection/sandy-pike-purco-fleet-services/ and check the comment section. The complaint is against Purco Fleet Services submitted by ‘Jay’. The same day, the website owner himself posted this comment –

What a bastard !

Same case here – http://www.complaintslist.com/auto-rentals/hertz/


The Internet never forgets, neither do we

So Mr Jay, you still own these websites/domains ?

  1. 2012-president.com
  2. ashleyswigs.com
  3. atlantahotelsavings.com
  4. ballarddesignstudio.com
  5. ballardinteriordesign.com
  6. bostonhotelsavings.com
  7. bostonredsoxtickets.us
  8. brucecohenfurniturestolemymoney.com
  9. buycheapwigsonline.com
  10. carlkuhlmanphd.com
  11. chicagohotelsavings.com
  12. comparasite.com
  13. condocompany.com
  14. dallashotelsavings.com
  15. dealsnewyork.com
  16. dealsnewyork.net
  17. deninteriors.com
  18. denverhotelsavings.com
  19. designsbyballard.com
  20. disneyworldtickets.co
  21. drdaignault.com
  22. duxburyventures.com
  23. findwebsitesvalue.com
  24. findwebsitesworth.com
  25. fullfrontlacewigs.com
  26. gadacag.com
  27. getdum.com
  28. getdumb.com
  29. hawaiihotelsavings.com
  30. houstonhotelsavings.com
  31. internetcreators.info
  32. internetcreators.org
  33. internetgroove.com
  34. internetgroove.net
  35. jay-daignault.com
  36. jaydaignault.com
  37. listofbroadwayshows.com
  38. losangeleshotelsavings.com
  39. miamihotelsavings.com
  40. mountainwestmag.com
  41. mountainwestmagazine.com
  42. myrtlebeachhotelsavings.com
  43. nawdaq.com
  44. newenglandermag.com
  45. newenglandermagazine.com
  46. newenglandermagazine.info
  47. newenglandermagazine.net
  48. newenglandermagazine.org
  49. newyorkhotelsavings.com
  50. orlandohotelsavings.net
  51. sanfranciscohotelsavings.com
  52. seattlehotelsavings.com
  53. thebestnewyorkdeals.com
  54. thenewenglandermag.com
  55. thenewenglandermagazine.com
  56. ticketscrazy.com
  57. tnemag.com
  58. tnemag.info
  59. tnemag.net
  60. tnemag.org
  61. uberworth.com
  62. wb2.com
  63. webvals.com

Is that it?

Nope, there’s more. When we spoke about associates, we really meant it. Here are the other 2 co-conspirators in this extortion-scheme –

Jennings, Robert
5401 S Kirkman Rd Suite 725
Orlando, FL 32819

O’Connell, Patrick
300 Commercial Street, Unit 408
Boston, MA 02109

 

Then there’s Nathan Carpenter. We’re almost sure that this person DOES NOT EXIST. He is painted as the managing editor at Complaintslist.com – http://www.complaintslist.com/about-us/nathan-carpenter . He even has a linkedin profile. Very convenient to display a face and hie the actual identities behind this crappy website.

These 2 are the ‘partners’ named associated with ‘ Duxbury Ventures, LLC’, the parent company. Only they would know deep down if they’re guilty.

 

 

Now we’ll change our focus on to PATRICK O’CONNELL. 

4 Responses to :
Exposing Complaintslist.com

  1. JayD says:

    The information contained on this website is false.

    If anyone has any questions please contact me directly.

    Thanks.

  2. Hello – To Whom it May Concern,

    Firstly, these are woeful and unethical tactics for one to employ who disagrees with a single function of our company. Furthermore, the supposed personal-connections this site maintains- are false ones, but additionally the very idea/term, “Guilty by Association” is in reality a fallacy (not a real thing, not recognized as legitimate)- legally or otherwise. So, it’s clear the ideals and methods employed on this site are not only offensive but subversive, and its likely unreasonable to assume we can dissuade these opinions but we feel it’s our duty to respond, regardless:

    This page is completely inaccurate. These people do not own our website nor have control of it. Jay was a partial owner of this domain in the past and his role was to provide search engine optimization services. Any comment left by Jay or anyone previously or currently employed by Complaints List (in our comments section, not as an official complaint) was done so as a user within their legal right, not in any capacity for the company. Although, there are very few examples of such content. Any comments made that represent our company are marked “admin”.

    Further, we have nothing to hide as we closely follow the laws applicable to our business. Your claims of extortion are baseless and untrue. We (any and all employees of Complaints List) do not, and have never, generated, copied, nor posted complaints to our website. Complete records are kept of every complaint posted, and information concerning the individual complainant. (These records are private and only released by subpoena or with written consent from the original user who submitted the content, as per the law).

    Our traffic, records, and reputation justify and accurately reflect our extensive database of reviews, comments, and complaints.

    We do charge a fee, specifically when a company wishes to initiate our in-house dispute process. It is one of several options for companies to reach out to complainants, while also allowing for anonymity and respecting the privacy and safety of our users. But, there are also free options that don’t have an associated fee, making the claims on this page inaccurate.

    Our service has been well received by our users and companies who want to rectify consumer issues, as it provides an economical and effective way to manage complaints versus taking legal action, or other similar avenues. We feel it’s beneficial and appropriate to provide such options, as opposed to having no way to respond to complaints at all, let alone resolve problems – which is the case with many competing review websites.  It takes our time and effort to manage each dispute and by charging this fee we are able to continue offering this service to the public.

    If anyone has any questions please don’t hesitate to contact us directly: 

    admin@complaintslist.com 
    (774) 257-4611

    Regards, Complaints List Inc

  3. Vigilante says:

    What a load of crap. Let us dissect your rebuttal point-by-point –

    “Firstly, these are woeful and unethical tactics for one to employ who disagrees with a single function of our company. Furthermore, the supposed personal-connections this site maintains- are false ones, but additionally the very idea/term, “Guilty by Association” is in reality a fallacy (not a real thing, not recognized as legitimate)- legally or otherwise. So, it’s clear the ideals and methods employed on this site are not only offensive but subversive, and its likely unreasonable to assume we can dissuade these opinions but we feel it’s our duty to respond, regardless:”

    These are ‘legitimate’ website and content. We’re simply publishing the facts available in public records. What people do using this information is speculation, and frankly none of our business. We’re not liable. Anything posted here is considered as an opinion. We’re not doing anything which complaintslist.com is not doing. Freedom of speech, zero censorship, a platform to expose the corrupt and incompetent. Since you feel you’re doing a stellar job at your website, why are you worried? We’re sure you’ll get support from your users.

    “This page is completely inaccurate. These people do not own our website nor have control of it. Jay was a partial owner of this domain in the past and his role was to provide search engine optimization services. Any comment left by Jay or anyone previously or currently employed by Complaints List (in our comments section, not as an official complaint) was done so as a user within their legal right, not in any capacity for the company. Although, there are very few examples of such content. Any comments made that represent our company are marked “admin”.”

    Yes, they have full control, and we cannot stress enough that you’re blatantly lying. Having tried hard to bribe us and threaten us, you’re resorting to try and confuse us.

    The public data indicate that you and your wife runs complaintslist.com. No shame in admitting it. We can also prove that you plant content and comments to boast search engine rankings, and manipulate the company’s profile for purely financial benefit. In fact, we can comprehensively prove (using mock tests done weeks ago) on how you edited and planted content on your own. Remember, the moment you edit a single dot, you don’t have the CDA 230 immunity anymore. So stop wasting our time.

    “Further, we have nothing to hide as we closely follow the laws applicable to our business. Your claims of extortion are baseless and untrue. We (any and all employees of Complaints List) do not, and have never, generated, copied, nor posted complaints to our website. Complete records are kept of every complaint posted, and information concerning the individual complainant. (These records are private and only released by subpoena or with written consent from the original user who submitted the content, as per the law).”

    Really? How about comping out in the open ? Revealing your identity (if you claim you’re not Jay). You’re just a bunch of pansies running a short scam. And you got caught.

    “We do charge a fee, specifically when a company wishes to initiate our in-house dispute process. It is one of several options for companies to reach out to complainants, while also allowing for anonymity and respecting the privacy and safety of our users. But, there are also free options that don’t have an associated fee, making the claims on this page inaccurate.”

    HERE WE GO. Here’s how the scam benefits you. Thank you for explaining.

    “Our service has been well received by our users and companies who want to rectify consumer issues, as it provides an economical and effective way to manage complaints versus taking legal action, or other similar avenues. We feel it’s beneficial and appropriate to provide such options, as opposed to having no way to respond to complaints at all, let alone resolve problems – which is the case with many competing review websites. It takes our time and effort to manage each dispute and by charging this fee we are able to continue offering this service to the public.”

    Most BS. It’s an extortion fee of $500 and above to remove a complaint. Nothing more, nothing less. Try to remove one from cyberextortion.org. We dare you !

  4. Rock says:

    Complaintlist.com is destroying my life. I fell into deep depression, and my family is in danger. I email them about deleting the complaint made about me (lies), however, two weeks later and the link is still very much alive. They want to make people anxious; they know people would end up giving up and paying them $500. This is awful and psychologically damaging. Thanks for exposing them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *